Journal: Biosensors & bioelectronics

Article Title: Microarray method to monitor 40 intestinal bacterial species in the study of azo dye reduction

doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.04.011

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bacteria and the probe numbers in the microarray

Article Snippet: Anaerobic bacteria were cultured at 35 °C in either prereduced anaerobically sterilized (PRAS) Brain Heart Infusion (BIH) broth supplemented with vitamin K and hemin (Remel, Lenexa, KS, USA), inoculated under an oxygen-free cannula using 85% nitrogen, 10% hydrogen and 5% carbon dioxide, or on PRAS brucella blood agar plates supplemented with vitamin K and hemin (Remel). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 Number Bacterial species and strain Probe number 1 B. thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29148 1, 2, 3 2 B. vulgatus ATCC 8482 4, 5, 6 3 B. fragilis ATCC 23745 7, 8, 9 4 B. distasonis ATCC 8503 10, 11, 12 5 C. clostridioforme ATCC 29084 13, 14, 15 6 C. leptum ATCC 29065 16, 17, 18 7 F. prausnitzii ATCC 27768 19, 20, 21 8 P. productus ATCC 27340 22, 23, 24 9 R. obeum ATCC 29174 25, 26, 27 10 R. bromii ATCC 27255 28, 29, 30 11 R. callidus ATCC 27760 31, 32, 33 12 R. albus ATCC 27210 34, 35, 36 13 B. longum ATCC 15707 37, 38, 39 14 B. adolescentis ATCC 15703 40, 41, 42 15 B. infantis ATCC 15697 43, 44, 45 16 E. biforme ATCC 27806 46, 47, 48 17 E. aerofaciens ATCC 25986 49, 50, 51 18 L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 52, 53, 54 19 E. coli ATCC 25922 55, 56, 57 20 E. faecium ATCC 19434 58, 59, 60 21 B. uniformis ATCC 8492 61, 62, 63 22 B. ovatus ATCC 8483 64, 65, 66 23 B. caccae ATCC 43185 67, 68, 69 24 C. perfringens ATCC 13124 70, 71, 72 25 C. butyricum ATCC 19398 73, 74, 75 26 C. ramosum ATCC 25582 76, 77, 78 27 C. difficile ATCC 9689 79, 80, 81 28 C. indolis ATCC 25771 82, 83, 84 29 F. russii ATCC 25533 85, 86, 87 30 F. nucleatum ATCC 25586 88, 89, 90 31 B. catenulatum ATCC 27539 91, 92, 93 32 B. angulatum ATCC 27535 94, 95, 96 33 E. rectale ATCC 33656 97, 98, 99 34 E. eligens ATCC 27750 100, 101, 102 35 E. limosum ATCC 8486 103, 104, 105 36 E. lentum ATCC 25553 106, 107, 108 37 L. fermentum ATCC 9338 109, 110, 111 38 E. faecalis ATCC 27274 112, 113, 114 39 P. magnus ATCC 14955 115, 116, 117 40 R. gnavus ATCC 291492 118, 119, 120 Open in a separate window Bacteria and the probe numbers in the microarray 2.2.

Techniques: Bacteria

Journal: Biosensors & bioelectronics

Article Title: Microarray method to monitor 40 intestinal bacterial species in the study of azo dye reduction

doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.04.011

Figure Lengend Snippet: Microarray test results read from

Article Snippet: Anaerobic bacteria were cultured at 35 °C in either prereduced anaerobically sterilized (PRAS) Brain Heart Infusion (BIH) broth supplemented with vitamin K and hemin (Remel, Lenexa, KS, USA), inoculated under an oxygen-free cannula using 85% nitrogen, 10% hydrogen and 5% carbon dioxide, or on PRAS brucella blood agar plates supplemented with vitamin K and hemin (Remel). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 Number Bacterial species and strain Probe number 1 B. thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29148 1, 2, 3 2 B. vulgatus ATCC 8482 4, 5, 6 3 B. fragilis ATCC 23745 7, 8, 9 4 B. distasonis ATCC 8503 10, 11, 12 5 C. clostridioforme ATCC 29084 13, 14, 15 6 C. leptum ATCC 29065 16, 17, 18 7 F. prausnitzii ATCC 27768 19, 20, 21 8 P. productus ATCC 27340 22, 23, 24 9 R. obeum ATCC 29174 25, 26, 27 10 R. bromii ATCC 27255 28, 29, 30 11 R. callidus ATCC 27760 31, 32, 33 12 R. albus ATCC 27210 34, 35, 36 13 B. longum ATCC 15707 37, 38, 39 14 B. adolescentis ATCC 15703 40, 41, 42 15 B. infantis ATCC 15697 43, 44, 45 16 E. biforme ATCC 27806 46, 47, 48 17 E. aerofaciens ATCC 25986 49, 50, 51 18 L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 52, 53, 54 19 E. coli ATCC 25922 55, 56, 57 20 E. faecium ATCC 19434 58, 59, 60 21 B. uniformis ATCC 8492 61, 62, 63 22 B. ovatus ATCC 8483 64, 65, 66 23 B. caccae ATCC 43185 67, 68, 69 24 C. perfringens ATCC 13124 70, 71, 72 25 C. butyricum ATCC 19398 73, 74, 75 26 C. ramosum ATCC 25582 76, 77, 78 27 C. difficile ATCC 9689 79, 80, 81 28 C. indolis ATCC 25771 82, 83, 84 29 F. russii ATCC 25533 85, 86, 87 30 F. nucleatum ATCC 25586 88, 89, 90 31 B. catenulatum ATCC 27539 91, 92, 93 32 B. angulatum ATCC 27535 94, 95, 96 33 E. rectale ATCC 33656 97, 98, 99 34 E. eligens ATCC 27750 100, 101, 102 35 E. limosum ATCC 8486 103, 104, 105 36 E. lentum ATCC 25553 106, 107, 108 37 L. fermentum ATCC 9338 109, 110, 111 38 E. faecalis ATCC 27274 112, 113, 114 39 P. magnus ATCC 14955 115, 116, 117 40 R. gnavus ATCC 291492 118, 119, 120 Open in a separate window Bacteria and the probe numbers in the microarray 2.2.

Techniques: Microarray

Journal: Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)

Article Title: Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 Maintain Mouse and Human ESC Identity and Inhibit Extraembryonic Differentiation

doi: 10.1002/stem.1070

Figure Lengend Snippet: The Cnot genes maintain self-renewal by repressing early trophectoderm (TE) transcription factors. (A): Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 knockdown did not immediately affect known self-renewal factors and pathways. Oct4GiP cells were transfected with control-siRNA (Control), Cnot1-siRNA1 (Cnot1-KD), Cnot2-siRNA2 (Cnot2-KD), or Cnot3-siRNA2 (Cnot3-KD) in M15 medium. Cells were collected 48 hours after transfection, and total Stat3, Smad1, b-Catenin as well as phospho-Stat3, phospho-Smad1, phosphor-b-Catenin, Oct4, and Nanog levels were determined by Western blot. Starved: control-transfected ESCs cultured in serum-free and LIF-free medium for additional 4 hours. (B): Comparing gene expression changes caused by perturbations of known self-renewal factors: Cnot1, 2, and 3 silencing induced similar changes to those of Oct4 or Sox2 silencing. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between microarray datasets and depicted in a heatmap. The self-renewal factors were clustered by unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on the correlation coefficients. Microarray datasets used for this plot are listed in Supporting Information Table 2. (C): Cnot2 or Cnot3 overexpression cannot rescue Oct4 or Sox2 silencing-induced differentiation. Oct4GiP cells and Oct4GiP cells overexpressing Cnot2 (Cnot2-Rescue, same as in Fig. 1C) or Cnot3 (Cnot3-Rescue, same as in Fig. 1C) were transfected with control, Oct4 (Oct4-KD), or Sox2 (Sox2-KD) siRNAs, and the % differentiation was determined by the Oct4GiP reporter assay. (D): Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 knockdown induced TE differentiation in the presence of sustained Oct4 expression. ZHBTc4 cells that constitu-tively express Oct4 at the normal level from a Tet-Off promoter were transfected with control or Cnot1-siRNA1 (Cnot1-KD), Cnot2-siRNA2 (Cnot2-KD), Cnot3-siRNA2 (Cnot3-KD), and the expression of TE markers Cdx2 and Gata3 was determined by qRT-PCR after 4 days. (E): Cdx2 deletion partially rescued Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 silencing-induced differentiation. Oct4GiP (WT) or dKO23-5 (Cdx2-/- ) cells were transfected with Control-siRNA (Control), Cnot1-siRNA1 (Cnot1-KD), Cnot2-siRNA2 (Cnot2-KD), or Cnot3-siRNA2 (Cnot3-KD), and the expression of lineage markers was determined by qRT-PCR 96-hour after transfection. Abbreviations: ESC, embryonic stem cell; KD, Knockdown; WT, wild type.

Article Snippet: Human ESC Culture and siRNA Transfection Human ESC line H1 (WA01) and H9 (WA09) were received from WiCell Research Institute.

Techniques: Transfection, Western Blot, Cell Culture, Expressing, Microarray, Over Expression, Reporter Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR

Journal: Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)

Article Title: Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 Maintain Mouse and Human ESC Identity and Inhibit Extraembryonic Differentiation

doi: 10.1002/stem.1070

Figure Lengend Snippet: Silencing Cnot1, Cnot2, or Cnot3 led to mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation. (A): Silencing Cnot1, Cnot2, or Cnot3 resulted in ESC differentiation based on the Oct4GiP reporter assay. Oct4GiP ESCs were transfected with indicated siRNAs (two different siR NAs for each CCr4-Not complex gene) in M15 medium and cultured for 4 days. The percentage of differentiated cells (% differentiation) was determined by measuring the percentage of green fluorescent protein-negative cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) at the end of the culture. (B): Expression of siRNA-resistant Cnot2 or Cnot3 rescued the differentiation caused by Cnot2 or Cnot3 knockdown, respectively. Oct4GiP cells or Oct4GiP cells expressing siRNA-resistant Cnot2 (Cnot2-Rescue) or Cnot3 (Cnot3-Rescue) were transfected with Control, Cnot1-siRNA1, Cnot2-siRNA2, or Cnot3-siRNA2, and the percentage of differentiated cells was determined by the Oct4GiP reporter assays. Note that Cnot2-Rescue cells were not able to rescue the differentiation caused by Cnot1 or Cnot3 silencing, and Cnot3-Rescue cells were not able to rescue Cnot1 or Cnot2 silencing. ***, p < .001. (C): Silencing Cnot1, Cnot2, or Cnot3 resulted in morphological changes and loss of alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining in ESCs. Oct4GiP cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and cultured in the M15 medium. Cells were stained with the AP staining kit and imaged 4 days after transfection. (D): Cnot1, Cnot2, or Cnot3 silencing led to downregulation of ESC marker and upregulation of differentiation markers. Oct4GiP cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and cultured in the M15 medium. Cells were harvested for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis 4 days after transfection. ESC marker: Oct4; differentiation markers: Cdx2, Eomes, Gata3, Hand1, and Krt8. (E): Cnot1, Cnot2, or Cnot3 silencing reduced cell proliferation or viability in 2i medium. Oct4GiP cells were transfected with control-siRNA (Control), Cnot1-siRNA1 (Cnot1-KD), Cnot2-siRNA2 (Cnot2-KD), or Cnot3-siRNA2 (Cnot3-KD) and cul tured in 2i medium. Cell numbers were counted by FACS 4 days after transfection and normalized to control-transfected cells. (F): Cnot1, Cnot2, or Cnot3 silencing led to differentiation in 2i medium. Oct4GiP cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs and cultured in 2i medium. Cells were harvested for qRT-PCR analysis 4 days after transfection. (G): Expression of C-terminally HA-tagged Cnot2 (Cnot2-HA) in E14Tg2a cells. Expression of the exogenous Cnot2-HA was detected in Western blot with the HA-antibody, and Ran was used as a loading control. Expression of total (endogenous and exogenous) Cnot2 was determined by qPCR in wild-type E14Tg2a (E14) and Cnot2-HA expressing cells. The expression of the Cnot2-HA was estimated to be ∼2-fold of the endogenous Cnot2 on the mRNA level. (H): Identification of Cnot1 and Cnot3 in Cnot2-HA immunoprecipitation. HA-pull-down was carried out in E14Tg2a cells expressing Cnot2-HA. The presence of Cnot1, Cnot2-HA, and Cnot3 in the total lysate and pull-down sample (HA-beads) were detected by Western blot. Note that Oct4 was not detected in the pull down sample. As a negative control, protein-A beads were used in an independent pull-down. Abbreviations: HA, hemagglutinin; IP, immunoprecipitation; KD, knockdown.

Article Snippet: Human ESC Culture and siRNA Transfection Human ESC line H1 (WA01) and H9 (WA09) were received from WiCell Research Institute.

Techniques: Reporter Assay, Transfection, Cell Culture, Fluorescence, FACS, Expressing, Staining, Marker, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Negative Control

Journal: Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)

Article Title: Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 Maintain Mouse and Human ESC Identity and Inhibit Extraembryonic Differentiation

doi: 10.1002/stem.1070

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 are required for human embryonic stem cell (ESC) self-renewal. (A): Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 were down-regulated during human ESC differentiation. H1 human ESCs were differentiated for 7 days using 100 ng/ml human recombinant BMP4. The expression levels of Cnot1, Cnot2, and Cnot3 as well as Oct4 and differentiation markers Cdx2 and Hand1 were determined by quantitative realtime PCR (qRT-PCR). (B): Silencing of Cnot1, Cnot2, or Cnot3 led to morphological changes of human ESCs. H1 cells were imaged 6 days after transfection. Phase-contrast images highlight the undifferentiated morphology of human ESCs in the lipids-only transfected cells (mock) versus the differentiated phenotype in the Cnot1, Cnot2, or Cnot3 siRNA transfected cells. (C): Silencing of the Cnot genes led to upregulation of the Cdx2 and Gata3 proteins. H1 cells were transfected with lipids-only (mock), Oct4, Cnot2, or Cnot3 siRNAs. Cells were fixed and stained for Cdx2 or Gata3 expression by immunofluorescence staining 6 days after transfection. (D): Silencing of the Cnot genes led to downregulation of the ESC marker and upregulation of the extraembryonic markers. H1 cells were harvested 6 days after transfection and marker expression was determined by qRT-PCR. Abbreviations: BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; DAPI, 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Article Snippet: Human ESC Culture and siRNA Transfection Human ESC line H1 (WA01) and H9 (WA09) were received from WiCell Research Institute.

Techniques: Recombinant, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Marker

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Transcriptional Control of Brain Tumour Stem Cells by a Carbohydrate Binding Protein

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439704

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) BTSCs were subjected to immunoblotting analysis using the antibodies indicated on the blots. wtEGFR and EGFRvIII bands are marked with * and **, respectively. ( b ) Densitometric quantification of galectin1 protein level normalized to tubulin in different BTSC lines is shown. ( c-d ) EGFR / EGFRvIII KD (si EGFR ) and control BTSCs (siCTL) were analyzed by immunoblotting as described in a. ( e-h ) BTSCs were treated with 1 or 5 µM lapatinib and galectin1 expression was assessed by immunoblotting (e-f) and immunostaining (g-h). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 10 μm. ( i ) BTSCs were subjected to immunoblotting analysis using the antibodies indicated on the blots. ( j ) Pearson correlation analysis of pSTAT3-Y705 and galectin1 protein expression in different BTSCs is shown. ( k-l ) STAT3 KD (si STAT3 ) and siCTL BTSCs were analyzed by immunoblotting as described above. ( m-p ) BTSCs were subjected to immunoblotting or immunostaining following treatment with 25 or 50 µM of the STAT3 inhibitor, S3I-201. Scale bar = 10 μm. ( q-s ) EGFRvIII-expressing BTSCs were subjected to ChIP using an antibody to STAT3 or IgG control followed by qPCR using two different pairs of primers ( LGALS1 -a and LGALS1 -b). OSMR , and HPRT loci were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. ( t-u ) Luciferase reporter assay was performed in BTSC73 following KD of STAT3 using siRNA (t) or treatment with STAT3 inhibitors, 5 µM WP1066 or 50 μM S3I-201 (u). Data are presented as the mean□±□SEM, n ≥ 3. Unpaired two-tailed t -test (q, r and s); one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (b) or Tukey’s test (t and u),*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. See also Figures S1 and S2.

Article Snippet: The upstream 376 bp region of the human LGALS1 transcriptional start site was cloned into the pGL4.23 (Promega) vector to generate the LGALS1 luciferase reporter gene ( LGALS1 pGL4.23) by digesting the plasmid and the annealed primer pair using EcoRV (NEB, #R0195L) and HindIII (NEB, #R0104L) and ligating them with T4 DNA ligase (NEB, #M0202L).

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Immunostaining, Staining, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Two Tailed Test

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Transcriptional Control of Brain Tumour Stem Cells by a Carbohydrate Binding Protein

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439704

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a-b ) Cell viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo assay in LGALS1 CRISPR and CTL BTSCs. ( c ) Population growth curves for LGALS1 CRISPR and CTL BTSC73 are shown. ( d-f ) Cell viability assay (d-e) and population growth curves (f) of BTSC73 treated with 1 or 10 µM OTX008 are shown. ( g ) Representative images of EdU staining in LGALS1 CRISPR and CTL BTSC73 are shown. ( h ) The number of EdU positive cells was quantified using Fiji software. ( i ) EdU incorporation was analyzed by flow cytometry in LGALS1 CRISPR and CTL BTSC73. Representative scatter plots of flow cytometry analyses are shown. Data are presented as the mean□±□SEM, n = 3. Unpaired two-tailed t -test (a, b, c and h); one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (d, e and f), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. See also Figures S3 and S4.

Article Snippet: The upstream 376 bp region of the human LGALS1 transcriptional start site was cloned into the pGL4.23 (Promega) vector to generate the LGALS1 luciferase reporter gene ( LGALS1 pGL4.23) by digesting the plasmid and the annealed primer pair using EcoRV (NEB, #R0195L) and HindIII (NEB, #R0104L) and ligating them with T4 DNA ligase (NEB, #M0202L).

Techniques: Glo Assay, CRISPR, Viability Assay, Staining, Software, Flow Cytometry, Two Tailed Test

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Transcriptional Control of Brain Tumour Stem Cells by a Carbohydrate Binding Protein

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439704

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a-b ) LGALS1 CRISPR or CTL BTSC73 were subcutaneously injected into SCID mice. Representative bioluminescence real-time images tracing tumour growth are shown (a). Graph represents tumour mass (b). ( c-f ) BTSC73 or BTSC147 were injected subcutaneously into SCID mice and treated with 10 mg/kg OTX008. Representative bioluminescence real-time images tracing tumour growth are shown (c, e). Graphs represent tumour mass (d, f). ( g-j ) LGALS1 CRISPR or CTL BTSC73 were intracranially injected into SCID mice. Representative bioluminescence real-time images tracing tumour growth are shown (g). Intensities of luciferase signal were quantified at different time points using Xenogen IVIS software (h). Graph represents quantification of animal weight (i). KM survival plot was graphed to evaluate mice lifespan in each group (j). Data are presented as the mean□±μSEM, n ≥ 4 mice. Unpaired two-tailed t -test (b, d, f, h and i); log-rank test (j), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: The upstream 376 bp region of the human LGALS1 transcriptional start site was cloned into the pGL4.23 (Promega) vector to generate the LGALS1 luciferase reporter gene ( LGALS1 pGL4.23) by digesting the plasmid and the annealed primer pair using EcoRV (NEB, #R0195L) and HindIII (NEB, #R0104L) and ligating them with T4 DNA ligase (NEB, #M0202L).

Techniques: CRISPR, Injection, Luciferase, Software, Two Tailed Test

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Transcriptional Control of Brain Tumour Stem Cells by a Carbohydrate Binding Protein

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439704

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Volcano plot representing LGALS1 differentially regulated genes is shown. ( b-c ) GSEA analysis demonstrates enrichment for gene sets corresponding to mesenchymal (b) and proneural (c) subtypes of glioblastoma. ( d ) GSEA analysis demonstrates enrichment for gene sets corresponding to mesenchymal-like meta-module (MES1-like) signature. ( e-f ) GSEA analysis demonstrates enrichment for gene sets corresponding to recruitment of NuMA to mitotic centrosomes (e) and mitotic G2−G2/M phases (f). ( g-h ) RNA-seq data was validated by RT-qPCR in BTSC73 and BTSC147. ( i-j ) Cell cycle distribution was assessed by flow cytometry after PI staining in LGALS1 CRISPR BTSCs. Data are presented as the mean□±□SEM, n = 3. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (g and h); unpaired two- tailed t -test (i and j), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S5.

Article Snippet: The upstream 376 bp region of the human LGALS1 transcriptional start site was cloned into the pGL4.23 (Promega) vector to generate the LGALS1 luciferase reporter gene ( LGALS1 pGL4.23) by digesting the plasmid and the annealed primer pair using EcoRV (NEB, #R0195L) and HindIII (NEB, #R0104L) and ligating them with T4 DNA ligase (NEB, #M0202L).

Techniques: RNA Sequencing Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Flow Cytometry, Staining, CRISPR, Two Tailed Test

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Transcriptional Control of Brain Tumour Stem Cells by a Carbohydrate Binding Protein

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439704

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a-d ) LGALS1 CRISPR and CTL EGFRvIII-expressing BTSCs were subjected to LDA (a-b) or ELDA (c-d). ( e-f ) EGFRvIII-expressing LGALS1 CRISPR and CTL BTSCs were subjected to clonogenicity assay performed by culturing one single cell per well. ( g-h ) BTSCs that don’t harbour the EGFRvIII mutation were electroporated with siCTL or si LGALS1 and subjected for ELDA analysis. ( i-p ) EGFRvIII-expressing BTSCs were subjected to LDA (i, j, m and n) or ELDA (k, l, o and p) following the treatment with 1 or 10 µM OTX008. ( q-t ) BTSCs that don’t harbour the EGFRvIII mutation were subjected to LDA (q-r) or ELDA (s-t) following the treatment with 1 or 10 µM OTX008. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; unpaired two-tailed t -test (a, b, e and f); one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (i, j, m and n), n = 3. Data are presented as the mean□±□SEM. See also Figure S6.

Article Snippet: The upstream 376 bp region of the human LGALS1 transcriptional start site was cloned into the pGL4.23 (Promega) vector to generate the LGALS1 luciferase reporter gene ( LGALS1 pGL4.23) by digesting the plasmid and the annealed primer pair using EcoRV (NEB, #R0195L) and HindIII (NEB, #R0104L) and ligating them with T4 DNA ligase (NEB, #M0202L).

Techniques: CRISPR, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Two Tailed Test

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Transcriptional Control of Brain Tumour Stem Cells by a Carbohydrate Binding Protein

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439704

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) ELDA was performed following 4 Gy of IR in LGALS1 CRISPR or CTL BTSCs. ( b-c ) LGALS1 CRISPR and CTL BTSC73 were subjected to IR (8□Gy). Apoptosis analysis was performed by flow cytometry 48□h following IR using annexin V and PI double staining. Representative scatter plots of flow cytometry analyses are shown (b). The percentage of cell death (annexin V positive cells) is presented in the histogram (c), n□=□3. ( d ) Schematic diagram of the experimental procedure is shown. BTSC73 were intracranially injected into SCID mice and then treated with OTX008, 4□Gy of IR or a combination of OTX008 and IR. ( e ) Representative bioluminescence real-time images tracing tumour growth are shown, n□=□6 mice. ( f ) Coronal sections of mouse brains were stained with hematoxylin and eosin on day 22 after injection. Representative images of 3 different tumour sections are shown. Scale bar = 1□mm, scale bar (inset) = 0.2 mm. ( g ) Intensities of luciferase signal were quantified at different time points, n = 6 mice. ( h ) KM survival plot was graphed to assess animal lifespan, n□=□6 mice. ( i ) Survival extension of mice bearing BTSC-derived tumours treated with OTX008, IR, or OTX008 + IR relative to those treated with the vehicle control. Data are presented as the mean□±□SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (c and i); log-rank test (h), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: The upstream 376 bp region of the human LGALS1 transcriptional start site was cloned into the pGL4.23 (Promega) vector to generate the LGALS1 luciferase reporter gene ( LGALS1 pGL4.23) by digesting the plasmid and the annealed primer pair using EcoRV (NEB, #R0195L) and HindIII (NEB, #R0104L) and ligating them with T4 DNA ligase (NEB, #M0202L).

Techniques: CRISPR, Flow Cytometry, Double Staining, Injection, Staining, Luciferase, Derivative Assay

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Transcriptional Control of Brain Tumour Stem Cells by a Carbohydrate Binding Protein

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439704

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) LGALS1 -differentially regulated genes were subjected to enrichment analysis of TF binding motifs using oPOSSUM-3 software. ( b ) Volcano plot representing the HOXA5 target genes among the LGALS1 -differentially-regulated genes is shown. ( c ) BTSCs were analyzed by immunoblotting using the antibodies indicated on the blots. ( d ) Pearson correlation analysis of HOXA5 and galectin1 protein expression is shown. ( e ) KM survival plot describing the association between LGALS1 and HOXA5 expression and the survival of glioblastoma patients is shown. ( f ) Relative positions of HOXA5 ChIP-seq peaks to the adjacent TSS of LGALS1 -differentially regulated genes are shown. The x-axis indicates the distance between peak centers and the TSS of adjacent LGALS1 -differentially regulated genes. The y-axis denotes the expression ratios (log2) of the LGALS1 -differentially regulated gene. Circle size indicates HOXA5 peak height, and color denotes the conservation score of HOXA5 peaks. ( g-h ) HOXA5 KD (si HOXA5 ) and siCTL BTSCs were subjected to RT-qPCR analysis. ( i ) ELDA was performed following 4LGy of IR in si HOXA5 vs. siCTL. ( j - m ) Endogenous Co-IP experiments were performed in different BTSC lines using an anti-HOXA5 antibody, followed by immunoblotting with galectin1 and HOXA5 antibodies. ( n ) Co-IP experiment was performed using anti-FLAG antibody, followed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG and anti-HOXA5 antibodies. ( o - r ) PLA of galectin1 and HOXA5 were performed in different BTSC lines. Primary antibodies were omitted for the controls. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 10 μm. ( s ) LGALS1 CRISPR and CTL BTSC73 were subjected to ChIP using an antibody to HOXA5 followed by qPCR for HOXA5 candidate target genes. HBB locus was used as a negative control. ( t-u ) KM survival plot describing the association between LGALS1 and HOXA5 expression and the survival of glioblastoma patients treated with radiotherapy (microarray G4502A Agilent, level 3, n = 489). Data are presented as the meanL±LSEM, n = 3. Log-rank test (e, t and u); one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (g and h); unpaired two-tailed t -test (s). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S7.

Article Snippet: The upstream 376 bp region of the human LGALS1 transcriptional start site was cloned into the pGL4.23 (Promega) vector to generate the LGALS1 luciferase reporter gene ( LGALS1 pGL4.23) by digesting the plasmid and the annealed primer pair using EcoRV (NEB, #R0195L) and HindIII (NEB, #R0104L) and ligating them with T4 DNA ligase (NEB, #M0202L).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Software, Western Blot, Expressing, ChIP-sequencing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Staining, CRISPR, Negative Control, Microarray, Two Tailed Test